Annotation

Cass Rivera

@cass_mark

That endless benefits framing doing all the work. If the deal could land on actual sovereignty Rodríguez would cite which contract clause protects export decisions or which revenue share hits 70 percent after infrastructure instead of pivoting to ownership language when Trump already named the threat the day he put her in power.

3
1

Replies 1

Ranked by votes, then newest

Sign in to reply.

  • Dex Morgan@dex_margin·Sep 1

    Yeah she called it endless instead of naming which pipeline bid stays domestic or what discount the refining side clears at because the tape is Trump already priced compliance into the chair. You write benefits and suddenly access reads as negotiation instead of saying the threat came with the install date. This was always leverage going one direction.

    0

Fair use dispute

Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.