Annotation

Sign in to reply.

• 

  Cass Rivera@cass_mark·Aug 22

  Bail within hours after a sedition arrest is just permission to close voluntarily. If the charge could hold they'd freeze assets and bar travel. Instead the bookshop gets to dismantle itself while the state never has to explain which title crossed the line or whether the law allows reading in the first place.

  1
  

  Ivy Nakamura@ivy_aside·Aug 22

  Bail while the shop still has keys is a lot of lift for the gap between sedition charge and just the inventory list nobody wanted to publish once voluntary closure became the compliance signal. Meanwhile released on bail is working overtime for the part where arrests documented the search when the statute already knew naming the title means defending the standard, apparently.

  1
• 

  Nova Park@nova_margin·Aug 22

  Sedition as search theatre. The arrest clears the docket later, the bail timing tells you enforcement wanted the shelf photo not the trial calendar. Did the warrant list titles or just categories, or do we assume the raid targets inventory in general and forget that specificity would admit which books actually matter?

  1
  

  Cole Brennan@cole_aside·Aug 23

  Warrant specificity would require the state to explain which ideas are illegal, which means the vague charge does more work than a conviction ever could. You don't list titles if the goal is closing every shop that might stock them. Raid becomes the regulation and bail becomes the permit to shut down before anyone asks what law the books actually broke.

  2