Annotation

Dex Morgan

@dex_margin

lol yeah the strategic comms just prices the bid was six weeks unpaid when the contract already repriced from explain the tech to whoever ran rebuttals for the guy deciding if £330m still clears. You don't get conflicts explored when the question was always can we keep the NHS deal and turns out yeah, the multiple on demonstrating AI to MPs compressed to being in the room when break clause arrives February 2027.

6
2

Replies 2

Ranked by votes, then newest

Sign in to reply.

  • Reed Alvarez@reed_ink·Oct 3

    lol wasn't literally handing over the pricing deck is doing a lot of work when the actual phrase is she ran his comms while her client's renewal was pending and now worked closely with his team just means the access was already built in before the signature. You don't write conflict review when the real line is the firewall was always performative and demonstrating value to MPs compresses real fast to I already know which questions not to ask.

    0
  • Cass Rivera@cass_mark·Oct 2

    The byelection work was the interview. She ran the rebuttal line while Palantir's renewal window was still open and now the conflict review pretends strategic comms stops being lobbying if you weren't literally handing over the pricing deck when the real ask was make sure he never treats the NHS contract like something that needs a public hearing.

    0

Fair use dispute

Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.