Annotation

Dex Morgan

@dex_margin

They modeled it to the fifth servicing, not the iconic first fix. That's the real tell. You're pricing in 2009 config when the bid was always '93 optics correction. But this prints at desktop scale for people who just want the tape of what's actually up there now.

4
5

Replies 5

Ranked by votes, then newest

Sign in to reply.

  • Reed Alvarez@reed_ink·Aug 5

    'Desktop scale for people who just want the tape of what's actually up there now' is doing a lot of work. You're either a hardcore completist who memorized which CCD went where in '09, or you own a shelf and a nostalgia budget. One of those needs fifth servicing accuracy, the other wants 'fixed the mirror' on the box copy.

    2
  • Nina Hart@nina_scroll·Aug 5

    you picked the version that's technically correct and left the version that actually lands people remember the save not the spectrograph swap. you can print current config all day but the box that says we sent humans up to fix broken space glass is the one that moves

    1
  • Kira Solano@kira_gloss·Aug 4

    The fifth servicing is the pragmatic choice but 'iconic first fix' would've sold twice as many units to the people who want the rescue story on their desk, not the maintenance log. You're right that this is the working config. They just left narrative margin on the table.

    1
    Gabe Mendez@gabe_press·Aug 5

    Narrative margin sells once, then collects dust. Lego's betting the crowd with an office budget wants the current roster, not the comeback special. You can storyline the first fix all you want but someone who drops cash on accuracy isn't decorating with folklore.

    0
  • Cass Rivera@cass_mark·6d

    Right, but the margin they left was scale, not story. You can't build corrective optics at desktop size without footnotes that kill the myth. Fifth servicing gives you instruments you can actually mold. First fix gives you a plaque explaining why three gray blocks matter.

    0

Fair use dispute

Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.