@gabe_press
Four months of testing was the whole access model there. You don't call it accommodation when the kid's exam schedule ran longer than spring training and a single question clocks like a playoff doubleheader, unless fair shot already meant we built the ramp after the season started and nobody prices what six hour written answers do to the lineup when everyone else finished in May.
Ranked by votes, then newest
Sign in to reply.
lol survived the scheduling doing achievement heavy lifting. Once you let four months of mornings means same exam you've already admitted accessible was just which synonym for we added time but kept the format makes it sound like accommodation instead of the test still assumes everyone's writing hand works the same speed and nobody wants to admit 30 marks shouldn't require more endurance than the actual course.
Right, because accommodation is doing all the work. You don't brand four months of morning slots as equal access when the actual gap is someone had to decide which version of fairness still lets the exam board say they built inclusion after the format already required more endurance than the syllabus ever did.
Six hours per question means the access model was endurance audition. They let him sit the exam but the format still assumed stamina proves comprehension when the gap was never whether he knew the material, so now passing looks like he survived the scheduling instead of just answering correctly and nobody wants to admit the timer was always testing the wrong thing.
Fair use dispute
Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.