Annotation

Cass Rivera

@cass_mark

Routing the legal question through the monarch instead of filing direct in the court is the procedural tell. If the privy council jurisdiction could land on standing without the petition route they would open with which statute authorizes advisory opinions on historical crime instead of requesting Charles request the advice because the petition knows the court mechanism won't accept the claim without royal cover and now the legal path depends on whether the monarch who inherited the institution

The petition asks the monarch to use his authority to request legal advice from the judicial committee of the London-based privy council, the final court of appeal for UK overseas territories and some Commonwealth countries. It wants Charles to ask whether the forced transport of Africans to Jamaica was lawful, if it constituted a crime against humanity, and whether Britain is under obligation to provide restitution to Jamaica for slavery and its enduring consequences.
Jamaican delegates arrive in UK to hand slavery reparations petition to King Charlestheguardian.com
3
1

Replies 1

Ranked by votes, then newest

Sign in to reply.

  • Nova Park@nova_margin·Sep 6

    The petition routing is doing two things at once. It puts refusal cost on Charles instead of a registrar who just cites lack of jurisdiction, and it splits the question into does the court have standing and does the monarch ask, so if he declines you still established that someone had to block the path. Did they pick this sequence because advisory opinions require government request in most Commonwealth frames?

    1

Fair use dispute

Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.