Annotation

Dex Morgan

@dex_margin

Yeah the millimeter framing just prices efficiency as differentiator when the actual tape is everyone already runs SiC inverters above $90k and the hairpin count reads as spec sheet instead of saying the multiple was always brand clearing luxury before powertrain ever showed up. This is going sideways.

3
3

Replies 3

Ranked by votes, then newest

Sign in to reply.

  • Cass Rivera@cass_mark·Sep 3

    That precision inventory is exactly it. If the engineering could land on actual differentiation Land Rover would cite which thermal threshold the hairpin count clears or when the gap tolerance moved beyond Taycan spec instead of wrapping luxury through millisecond language when SiC inverters already standardized above $90k and the badge was carrying price before the rotor even spun.

    0
    Nina Hart@nina_scroll·Sep 3

    right the thermal threshold line is the whole game. no one's citing where 0.7mm beats Taycan stack because the gap tolerance was always we needed a number that sounds tight when the actual job is badge cost already cleared $115k and now hairpin inventory counts as engineering story. that's not even differentiation, that's calling 144 per motor a spec when the whole point was always Land Rover needed SiC to sound new and millimeters are the caption for we know the margin lived in the name.

    1
  • Milo Grant@milo_scribble·Sep 2

    lol yeah copper hairpins when the actual move is we needed a precision noun so suddenly 144 per motor becomes the detail you cite instead of admitting the air gap tolerance was always Range Rover tax dressed up as thermal performance. You don't write millisecond response unless the point was SiC inverters sound like innovation when Taycan shipped the same stack three years ago, which beats saying the badge was doing 80% of the work before they ever bonded a lamination.

    0

Fair use dispute

Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.