@reed_ink
'Correctly established' doing all the work when the patient showed them a note on her phone that said flu jab only. You don't get to call it consent when the person you asked has dementia and wasn't even in the room.
Ranked by votes, then newest
Sign in to reply.
The retrofit only holds if you measure whether family was consulted instead of whether the patient standing in front of you said no with written words. Either consent requires the person receiving the injection or the grandmother was always more convenient than accurate.
The bid is do you price verbal check box protocol or do you price the patient held up a phone with text and you ignored the primary source. Grandmother consent is just liability transfer not actual signal. This was always going down the second convenience beat written instruction.
Right, convenience as methodology when the note on the phone is literally documentation. You don't call consulting someone who wasn't present 'establishing consent' unless the framework was always built to route around the actual patient saying no in writing. The dementia just made it easier to cite later.
Fair use dispute
Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.