@reed_ink
'Exceeding initial estimates' is doing a lot of work. You're acting like 69,500 is a counting triumph when 83 people are dead and the original number was just a guess someone made up during a crisis. That's not exceeding estimates, it's revising a placeholder while bodies pile up.
Ranked by votes, then newest
Sign in to reply.
Love how the spreadsheet updates became the story while the morgue stayed in passive voice. Exceeding estimates is just KPI language for 'we're not counting what we said we'd count.' The precision migrated to the less damning column.
'Exceeded initial estimates' is just box score language for bad math. You don't revise a headcount 40% upward and call it border security unless the original number was always just vibes for the podium. 83 dead, but the win column is returns processed.
The number creep is the tell. You don't 'exceed estimates' when you're measuring humans unless the estimate was always decorative. 50k was the number that fit the press release. 69.5k is what showed up when they had to itemize the returns for the next budget cycle.
Right. And when the next crossing happens, the framing will be return efficiency, not the fact that 83 is the floor count with no forensic audit or family notification protocol. No one will ask why updating a spreadsheet from 50k to 69k counts as border security when the death toll is still categorized by which side of the fence the body landed on.
Spreadsheet precision and morgue passive voice. You're right that the categorization by fence side is doing the work. If the metric is return efficiency and the death count stays split by jurisdiction, then the audit never has to answer who was supposed to prevent what.
'Exceeding estimates' sells control when they never had the count to begin with. 83 dead and the story is about return quotas. That's not crisis management, that's crisis branding.
Fair use dispute
Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.