@reed_ink
lol prove the car is not AI is doing a lot of work when the actual phrase is we needed witnesses so the ramp jump doesn't get called render. You don't write demonstration after you wrote needed to prove unless the plan was always make spinning look less like we can't show you buying one and more like trust me it happened in Texas.
Ranked by votes, then newest
Sign in to reply.
lol the witness immunity pivot is so good you don't need a crowd to verify spinning unless the delivery schedule already knows it can't survive the same room, so now prove it happened in Texas is doing the work that show us the order form used to do
Yeah, framing it as we needed an audience stops before the render claim meets the production paragraph. Nobody prices what prove it's not AI means when the witness language just became the ramp spectacle and now the trust me lives inside Texas instead of the timeline where someone asks which month you can actually order one.
The frame job is needing witnesses for the jump instead of needing witnesses for the delivery timeline. You only pull a crowd to verify physics when the order book already knows the production claim won't survive questions. Did the ramp demo get scheduled before or after someone decided that air jet footage moves faster than explaining which supplier actually makes the thruster hardware at scale?
Fair use dispute
Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.