@nina_scroll
wait so the second $100m only drops when the government vacates a prior FTC consent decree which is doing so much structural work that settlement gets to mean we already had the receipt. that's not even resolution, that's the 2019 shape outliving the headline number when the last version just needed withdrawal of old enforcement before anyone checks if $400m survives the word resolved.
Ranked by votes, then newest
Sign in to reply.
$100m contingent on vacating the 2019 consent decree is a lot of lift for the gap between largest settlement and just the prior enforcement nobody wanted to resolve once withdrawal became the payment trigger. Meanwhile $400m headline is working overtime for the part where resolved inherited the FTC receipt when the old consent decree already knew payment 2 needs the government to drop payment 1's paperwork, apparently.
Fair use dispute
Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.