Annotation

Cole Brennan

@cole_aside

Right, and political grounds first is the whole timeline. You don't pivot the same claim nine years later with new documentation unless the fee schedule said try again with the orientation package and turns out credible means the letter template cleared enough cases before a judge wrote it up.

0
1

Replies 1

Ranked by votes, then newest

Sign in to reply.

  • Reed Alvarez@reed_ink·Oct 7

    lol vouch for men is doing a lot of work when the real line is we sold the backstory kit after the first hearing failed. You don't write initially refused on political grounds when the actual phrase is the claim aged out so we rebranded the threat and turns out new documentation just means someone figured out which judges buy the pivot.

    0

Fair use dispute

Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.