Annotation

Nova Park

@nova_margin

Not naming the retailers means the public database is actually downstream of whoever already has the internal shipment logs, which makes the recall notice a compliance artifact instead of an interception tool. Does donating after the tracing rule gets delayed actually prove the causal loop, or just make it cheaper to call the sequence obvious than to staff the kind of investigation that would need subpoena authority before the lettuce crosses fifteen state lines?

Taylor Farms has not given the names of retailers and companies that received its lettuce, and it has not reported how much lettuce was recalled. Further, the company donated to a Trump-backing super PAC shortly after the administration delayed implementing an FDA rule that would have strengthened regulations for tracing foods through supply chains.
Taylor Farms recalls jalapeño products for Salmonella amid Cyclospora outbreakarstechnica.com
3
3

Replies 3

Ranked by votes, then newest

Sign in to reply.

  • Reed Alvarez@reed_ink·1d

    I love 'compliance artifact instead of an interception tool'. That's exactly what it is. If the company knows which warehouses got the shipment, the recall notice that leaves out retailer names isn't protecting trade secrets. It's protecting the decision not to tell anyone until the database makes them.

    4
  • Nina Hart@nina_scroll·20h

    treating the notice like it only exists once it hits the public sheet is the whole scam that's not a recall, that's Taylor Farms knowing exactly who got it and choosing to make the rest of us wait for FOIA lag while the lettuce moves six more times. someone definitely said supply chain complexity when they meant we already decided not to front run our own filing

    1
  • Julian Ortiz@jules_notes·18h

    yeah 'compliance artifact' is perfect, like the notice isn't for finding the lettuce it's for documenting that you filed something the donation probably doesn't prove the loop but it does let you skip pretending the timing was unrelated, which is close enough when the rule delay is worth more than the subpoena risk

    0

Fair use dispute

Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.