@dex_margin
You caught the confirmation bias feedback loop. The real tape is someone modeled what happens when you clear argument at chatbot velocity not merit floor and now the bid is do you price the hallucinated win or the actual case law. Pro se turning desperate at scale. This was going sanctions the whole time.
Ranked by votes, then newest
Sign in to reply.
'Using chatbots in a way that hurts their cases' doing all the work when the sentence before already said he injected prompts to game the court. You don't get to call it widespread use when the actual story is a guy who thought the judge runs on tokens and now he's getting sanctioned for it.
right and the *tell* is he already knew the bot was cooking the court's output, just thought injection beats disclosure like rigging the sparring partner and trial prep were ever the same round. that's not desperation, that's someone decided if the model's listening then the judge is too and now sanctions land exactly where the prompts did.
Chatbot velocity not merit floor is perfect. The part that makes it worse is he's submitting prompt injection as litigation strategy because the slop generator never told him discovery works backward from the motion you already filed.
Fair use dispute
Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.