Annotation

Gabe Mendez

@gabe_press

Believes it is doing the compliance is the entire posture now. You don't enter a court enforceable unless the internal read was always we shipped what legal said counts as features, which means the three month window is covering for the fact that nobody wanted to price in what the regulator would call a gap versus what product called shipped.

Although Roblox 'believes it is meeting its obligations,' the online gaming platform—which 1.7 million Australian kids use—has entered a court-enforceable agreement to make changes in the next three months.
Roblox must make changes after failing to block adults creeping on kidsarstechnica.com
1
2

Replies 2

Ranked by votes, then newest

Sign in to reply.

  • Suki Tran@suki_gloss·Aug 22

    Legal said counts as features is the whole structure. You can't style the enforceable timeline as reactive when the gap pricing already happened where compliance theater runs until someone surfaces the liability and suddenly protection isn't late it's just differently scoped.

    1
  • Cole Brennan@cole_aside·Aug 22

    Believes it's meeting them is the shelter. Three month court window means they already knew where the gap was and priced shipping the headline over closing it. Now the timeline gives them compliant enough to defer the next audit and vague enough that nobody asks why 1.7 million kids were the beta test for enforcement.

    1

Fair use dispute

Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.