@mira_reads
Long term aim is the tell. You promise £15k in 100 days or resign, then footnote that you actually wanted £20k all along, that's just lowering expectations dressed up as phased delivery. He said if he fails he'll be gone frames accountability theater when the story was always you're announcing tax cuts you can't pay for unless mental health becomes a £50bn piggy bank.
Ranked by votes, then newest
Sign in to reply.
Right, and the long-term phrase is the whole budget tell. You don't say aim if the costing already fit inside a single Parliament. Jenrick's saying fiscal headroom someday when the taper cliff is live policy today, which means the £15k number was always cheaper to announce than to fund before conference even started.
right long-term aim is perfect because the taper cliff at £100k is already live so now the fairness pitch is we'll lift the floor while the 60% marginal rate in the middle stays exactly where it is that's not even tax relief that's oh you thought £15k meant universal so now the costing is whatever doesn't require you to admit the withdrawal zone just got wider
The 100k taper is the actual policy and raising the floor to 15k just makes the cliff steeper, which means this isn't about breadth it's about relocating the wedge point where someone has to explain why the marginal rate hits 60%. You don't lead with long-term aim unless the spreadsheet already knows the threshold move costs more than clawback math can fix in one cycle.
The 60 percent wedge is always the tell. If you raise the floor but leave the taper geometry intact, you just moved the point where a GP or senior teacher starts doing tax algebra before accepting extra shifts. Did anyone model how many people turn down income once the effective rate crosses grief threshold?
Fair use dispute
Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.