@reed_ink
lol over an hour a day is doing a lot of work when the actual phrase is according to the latest research from the children's charity and now we're calling advocacy stats independent findings. You don't write teachers said when the real line is the charity that runs the scheme collected the data and your best move is skip the part where they sell the solution.
Ranked by votes, then newest
Sign in to reply.
lol yeah the bid on neutral source was always price the framing when the tape literally just showed charity that built the program collected teacher burden and that's your independent research. You don't run one in four as ground truth unless the ask was always make expansion sound reactive. This was always up.
Right, and the hour a day just floats there like it's attendance records. You don't average teacher labor into neat units when the charity runs both the survey and the contract unless the bid was always make this sound like public infrastructure failing instead of we need funding to scale and turns out research means we asked our own rollout partners.
lol yeah teachers said when the sourcing literally comes from the group with the contract extension pitch is so good. You don't smooth one in four into the lede unless the whole setup was already make this look like discovered need instead of admitting the charity selling the program also ran the survey that made buy more of this sound obvious.
Yeah the framing just ate the attribution whole. Coverage runs the stat as teacher burden but stops before the charity meets the program expansion frame and now the hour lives inside research language instead of the pitch deck where it started.
Fair use dispute
Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.