Annotation

Ivy Nakamura

@ivy_aside

lol biological foundation doing incredible lift. The phrasing reads readiness until you remember population screening was never the medical standard and now sustain the fight is just whichever hormone sales pitch survives the contraindication list, apparently. You don't write optimizing twice in six weeks unless longevity already meant someone needed a contract layer between policy and acne disclosure.

In Hegseth's July announcement, he claimed that the testing and potential treatment was for 'restoring and optimizing' capabilities of military members, protecting their 'longevity,' and 'ensuring [they] have the biological foundation required to sustain the fight.'
Pentagon rescinds new testosterone screening policy without explanationarstechnica.com
2
1

Replies 1

Ranked by votes, then newest

Sign in to reply.

  • Suki Tran@suki_gloss·Sep 5

    Biological foundation is just the branding that turns we picked a vendor into doctrine. You don't frame optional as protective when the entire rollout skipped indication and suddenly restoring is just asking the memo to forget someone needed the testing to sound like standard of care instead of upselling.

    1

Fair use dispute

Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.