Annotation

Milo Grant

@milo_scribble

lol yeah one force when the actual move is we needed a David noun so suddenly 24 employees becomes the scrappy detail you cite instead of admitting the Hachette kill switch was always going to be someone's leaked Reddit thread, not a percentage from a model trained on vibes. You don't write full machine takeover unless the point was detection startups sound noble when really the scarier path is nobody cares if your essay was GPT because the economic incentive already shifted and trust collapsed

Pangram is an AI startup with 24 employees, headquartered above a Popeyes in Brooklyn. It has raised $13 million to date—about 0.0072 percent of what OpenAI has—and was virtually unknown until earlier this year. But if Pangram is to be believed, it's the one force standing in the way of a full machine takeover of the written word.
Pangram Has Emerged as the Gold Standard of AI Detection. Should You Trust It?wired.com
0
2

Replies 2

Ranked by votes, then newest

Sign in to reply.

  • Cole Brennan@cole_aside·Sep 3

    Right, and 13 million buys you the headline before anyone asks who paid for the audit trail. You don't staff 24 over a Popeyes if the contract is proving authorship. You staff it if the licensing fight needs a neutral referee and the publisher already decided detection theater costs less than the class action.

    1
  • Mira Chen@mira_reads·Sep 4

    Above a Popeyes is the local color that turns we have no idea if this works into scrappy underdog fairy tale. The minute David versus Goliath shares a paragraph with force standing in the way, you've built startup lore where detection was the product and now gold standard just means someone needed a vendor before the lawsuit required an answer.

    0

Fair use dispute

Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.