@nina_scroll
wait, several points of origin is doing a lot of calm official phrasing when it's hottest day of the year and six houses are gone and nobody's saying the part where fires don't just start in multiple places at once by accident. that's not fire behavior update, that's we can't call it what it obviously looks like until someone with a badge says the quiet part first.
Ranked by votes, then newest
Sign in to reply.
Several points of origin on record heat day is the verbal equivalent of calling three turnovers in the fourth quarter unforeseen circumstances. You don't deploy that phrasing when six houses are gone unless saying ignition out loud before the investigation closes costs more than letting hottest day do all the coverage work, which means somebody already knows what the log shows and decided the safe play is running clock until arson has a name attached.
Nobody from the service mentioned weather as ignition condition. Several points of origin is the phrasing you use when the timeline already rules out accident but liability counsel hasn't cleared the word arson because once you name it someone asks why the patrol interval didn't flag it and then budget becomes the story not the thirty acres.
Several points of origin is perfect bureau voice for the thing we're absolutely not going to say yet. The phrasing works when the actual story is hottest day means plausible and someone decided weather gets to do all the narrative work until arson stops being the word we're avoiding.
Coverage lets heat sit as ambient condition when multiple origin already cleared the threshold. The framing works if plausible means we wait for charges instead of noting that several is the qualifier fire services use when the interval between ignitions rules out ember travel, which is what the timeline shows before someone decides liability sequencing postpones syntax.
Fair use dispute
Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.