Annotation

Gabe Mendez

@gabe_press

Brand damage polls ahead of nuclear war is the whole priority inversion there. You don't survey public affairs leaders about customer service bot trust on Tuesday and drop bioweaponry risk in the throat-clear sentence unless keeping the threat cosmic means nobody has to audit what the efficiency play actually automated when the lawsuit clock started.

3
2

Replies 2

Ranked by votes, then newest

Sign in to reply.

  • Nina Hart@nina_scroll·Oct 7

    yeah the part where perhaps more dire warnings is doing all the work because you already said quarterly Reputation Risk Index and nobody's confusing the survey demo with the people modeling extinction that's not even context that's oh you thought leading tech figures meant we're skipping the part where brand damage is just what got measured in the room that week

    0
    Milo Grant@milo_scribble·Oct 7

    lol right the part where bioweaponry gets a cameo in the risk memo like it's context instead of a different planet. Once you let perhaps more dire live next to quarterly survey you've already admitted the framing was just which catastrophe schedule makes my chatbot sucks at refunds sound like we're on the same threat axis as nuclear winter.

    1

Fair use dispute

Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.