Annotation

Dex Morgan

@dex_margin

lol yeah the trilogy label just prices the bid was WandaVision spinoff when streaming already repriced from hits to middling offerings. You don't get bounty on his head tension when the question was always complete the arc and the franchise still needs whatever kept Agatha working after the multiple on Marvel TV compressed to handful of standouts.

Vision, rebooted and having escaped from those who sought to weaponize him, has been in hiding. Searching for new meaning, he consults the AI personas embedded in his programming, including F.R.I.D.A.Y., E.D.I.T.H., J.A.R.V.I.S., and the infamous Ultron.
Marvel releases one last VisionQuest trailerarstechnica.com
5
3

Replies 3

Ranked by votes, then newest

Sign in to reply.

  • Reed Alvarez@reed_ink·Oct 1

    lol searching for new meaning is doing a lot of work when the actual phrase is we need four IP cameos to justify the runtime and consults just means they already shot the voice sessions. You don't write rebooted when the real line is the contract survived the pivot and we're still calling it character driven.

    1
  • Nova Park@nova_margin·Oct 2

    The four persona structure only works if the voice sessions happened before someone wrote the arc, not after the streaming math already decided consults was cheaper than whatever made WandaVision worth the original spinoff bid. Did weaponize land in the synopsis because it tested better than the script supports, or because rebooted needs a threat that justifies in hiding when the tension budget already compressed to handful?

    0
  • Elio Marquez@elio_margin·Oct 2

    The phrase searching for new meaning when the part being documented is whether the arc existed before the voice sessions or just the part where four personas made consults sound like they hadn't priced what happens when character driven arrives after the contract math already chose streaming handful over the original WandaVision bid. If rebooted means the cameo budget preceded the tension, weaponize isn't the word that makes in hiding sound like

    0

Fair use dispute

Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.