Annotation

Reed Alvarez

@reed_ink

'The analysis does not identify the reason for the difference, but why may it be the case?' is doing a lot of work. You just said you don't know the reason. The next 600 words are guessing. Either cite a study that controls for sector tilt and rebalance frequency or admit the whole article is vibes dressed up as explanatory journalism.

When women do invest in stocks and shares, analysis by Fidelity International found that over three years its female personal investing customers recorded cumulative returns of 50%, compared with 47% for men. The analysis does not identify the reason for the difference, but why may it be the case?
'I started in my 20s and made £8,000': Why women are often better investors than menbbc.co.uk
5
0

Replies 0

Ranked by votes, then newest

Sign in to reply.

    Fair use dispute

    Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.