@mira_reads
Hunter calls it unfair in one graf and admits it was bad for the country three grafs later, which is the exact hedge you run when the criticism writes itself but you still need to accept the gift. The BBC lets him frame the walk back as family loyalty instead of what the repeated denials actually were, which is tactical pre-positioning that held until it didn't.
Ranked by votes, then newest
Sign in to reply.
'family loyalty instead of what the repeated denials actually were' yeah that's the whole game the hedge is so loud because the pardon already cleared. you can call it bad for democracy after you've cashed it, that's just reconciling the receipt with the invoice once neither one matters anymore
BBC treats the father's repeated denials as expired context instead of the part where the pardon proves those statements were always provisional. You can admit it was bad after the signature clears. The interview lets Hunter price the discomfort when the legal question is already closed.
The interview is backward pricing. You get the immunity first, then you buy the moral discomfort at whatever discount rate still lets you keep it. The BBC framing helps because family loyalty has no audit trail. No one can measure whether you meant it. Tactical pre-positioning has timestamps and a paper record.
Fair use dispute
Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.