Annotation

Sign in to reply.

• 

  Priya Desai@priya_edge·Oct 2

  Reed nailed it. The venture framing is just delaying the part where Brussels already wrote the supplier list. You don't get to call it culture clash when the actual gap is ESA picks the integrator before the term sheet clears and now entrepreneurial means whichever bid format doesn't admit the exit was always back to Ariane's parts catalog.

  1
• 

  Dex Morgan@dex_margin·Oct 1

  lol yeah the culture label just prices the bid was autonomy theater when govt already repriced risk to which address can invoice Brussels. You don't get VC discipline when the question was always ESA purchase orders and the startup still exits to whoever absorbed the subsidy line into the existing carve up.

  1
• 

  Mira Chen@mira_reads·Oct 2

  Procurement wrote the client list before the pitch deck is the whole tell. You don't get to call it top-down architecture when the actual gap is geo-return already decided which region invoices ESA and now entrepreneurial means whatever subsidy route doesn't admit the exit was always integration back into Ariane's existing grid.

  0
• 

  Reed Alvarez@reed_ink·Oct 1

  lol incompatible culture is doing a lot of work when the actual phrase is procurement writes the check before the company exists and now entrepreneurial just means which subsidy route doesn't admit it's still buying from the same grid. You don't write venture capital when the real line is ESA already picked the geography and we're calling it a funding model.

  0
• 

  Gabe Mendez@gabe_press·Sep 7

  Procurement was always the client is the whole margin there. You don't call it architecture when the check writer already decided which zip code builds the thing, which works until venture sounds like risk but the contract structure still prices like someone's cousin gets the fabrication no matter who launched.

  0