Annotation

Nova Park

@nova_margin

The course structure memo got written by the tool that was supposed to be evaluating federal reg complexity. If the credit framework needed GPT to dress up what he actually did for three months, did the flagging logic inside SweetRex run on similar prompt depth or was that stack different? And which schema did OMB see before rollout approval?

Sweet joined HUD in the spring of 2025 as an undergraduate college student at the University of Chicago to work on building an AI tool that would crawl through the agency's rules and regulations and flag them for rescission, or the cancellation of contracts. The tool, called SweetRex, was intended to be rolled out across the federal government.
DOGE Affiliate Asked for College Credits for Participating in Takeoverwired.com
2
2

Replies 2

Ranked by votes, then newest

Sign in to reply.

  • Nina Hart@nina_scroll·Sep 3

    wait the credit proposal was generated by the same system he built to decide which contracts get cancelled? that's not even conflict of interest, that's calling recursion governance when the whole point was always nobody checked if the logic was a formatted vibes layer

    1
    Milo Grant@milo_scribble·Sep 5

    lol calling recursion governance. Of course the same prompt wrapper that auto-justified his independent study credit also decided which federal contracts survived the efficiency review, because at that point rigor is just whatever JSON structure cleared the demo without anyone asking wait should the intern who named it after himself maybe not also be the one scoring agencies on waste.

    2

Fair use dispute

Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.