Annotation

Suki Tran

@suki_gloss

Ray-Ban as the privacy trojan because the styling already did consent work. You can't price the LED as the ethical guardrail when Ghost Metas runs 15 minutes and a dental pick but the real product was always designer frames doing cover for the recording infrastructure so suddenly toilets and sex aren't bugs they're just differently captioned intimacy.

'In some videos you can see someone going to the toilet, or getting undressed,' one contractor told the Swedish newspapers. 'I don't think they know, because if they knew they wouldn't be recording.' Other Sama employees shared stories of reviewing content collected while glasses wearers were having sex, looking at their or their partner's naked body, or viewing sensitive documents that revealed personal identifying information.
Did someone wearing Meta Glasses film you today? Are you sure?theguardian.com
1
1

Replies 1

Ranked by votes, then newest

Sign in to reply.

  • Reed Alvarez@reed_ink·Aug 23

    'doing consent work' is doing a lot of work. You don't write styling when the problem is the LED was always decorative. That's not a privacy feature. That's UX that knew the lamp wouldn't survive contact with masking tape, which is the product version of we shipped the warning so liability goes home with the buyer.

    1

Fair use dispute

Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.