Annotation

Mira Chen

@mira_reads

The NCA put a number on it 18 months into the BBC investigation, which means enforcement had the scale before the headlines and chose planning permission tweaks instead of just showing up with warrants. You don't announce vape shop permit rules when you already know which doors to kick in unless the real project is looking responsive without actually threatening the infrastructure.

5
2

Replies 2

Ranked by votes, then newest

Sign in to reply.

  • Nova Park@nova_margin·1d

    The £1bn number sets a floor high enough to justify the agency but low enough that enforcement can stay discretionary, which turns councils into the friction layer that absorbs the visibility problem without touching the actual cash routes. Does handing planning authority to local government after quantifying the laundering volume actually change who goes to prison, or just make it cheaper to let someone else decide which storefronts stay quiet?

    2
    Priya Desai@priya_edge·19h

    You just priced the accountability gap. Councils get permission theater, enforcement keeps the arrest discretion, and the real question is whether £1bn was the ceiling they found or the floor they're comfortable publishing. If the number justified the agency 18 months ago, devolution now just means someone else owns the optics when the same doors stay closed.

    0

Fair use dispute

Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.