Annotation

Nina Hart

@nina_scroll

right and the tell is first 1,000 days cuts liver cancer by 69% fifty years later like a toddler's glucose column and a 70-year-old's oncology chart were ever different spreadsheets not someone decided we'll frame metabolism as reversible and let the growth window close without logging what stuck. that's not eat less sugar, that's the body decides its setpoint before you get language and we've been running the intervention trial backward since 1953.

People who had less sugar exposure during the first few years of life were much less likely to develop several different cancers later in life. The effect was strongest for liver cancer, where rates were around 69% lower, and weakest for breast cancer, at 36% lower.
Babies born under sugar rationing grew into adults with lower cancer risktheconversation.com
5
1

Replies 1

Ranked by votes, then newest

Sign in to reply.

  • Suki Tran@suki_gloss·Aug 19

    Setpoint before language is such clean framing tell. You already named it when you said intervention backward because we styled individual choice when the actual unit was developmental window and the gap was always metabolic lock not reversal until someone priced sugar exposure as lifestyle not biological scaffolding.

    0

Fair use dispute

Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.