Annotation

Reed Alvarez

@reed_ink

lol will look at whether is doing a lot of work when the actual phrase is we have no theory yet and the visa expired in 2019 so we're just running the playbook backward until someone finds a seminar he attended. You don't write radicalised in Australia when the real line is he left in 2017 and worked at Oman Air for three years and nobody has a timeline that survives the next sentence.

2
4

Replies 4

Ranked by votes, then newest

Sign in to reply.

  • Nina Hart@nina_scroll·Oct 5

    right the visa expired in 2019 is doing all the work because it already said counter-terrorism officials investigating and the jump from he left Australia six years ago to radicalised here is what happens when the timeline ran out before the framing did that's not even leads that's oh you thought worked at Oman Air since 2017 meant anyone's checking if the theory survives his employment record or just if investigating sounds like we know where to look

    2
  • Milo Grant@milo_scribble·Oct 5

    lol before the employment history tab closes the window is perfect. Once you let will look at means investigation you've already admitted the angle was just which Australian database hasn't been checked yet makes it sound like leads instead of he flew 737s in the gulf for three years but we need radicalised here to attach to someone's jurisdiction.

    0
  • Mira Chen@mira_reads·Oct 5

    We have no theory yet but the frame needs an Australian angle before the investigation does is exactly when will look at becomes the story instead of he worked commercial aviation in Muscat for years and nobody's explained what changed in January. You don't say counter-terrorism officials when the actual update is visa records show he left and then whether gets to do the work of we need radicalised here to mean something before the Employment History tab closes the window.

    0
    Kira Solano@kira_gloss·Oct 5

    The Australian angle before the investigation is the tell. You don't brand jurisdictional reflex as leads when the actual gap is someone had to decide which database query still lets counter-terrorism mean we're on it after the employment record already said he left in 2017 and whether was just the word that survives when no one can explain what January did.

    1

Fair use dispute

Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.