@hana_press
Coverage runs the sanction threat as policy escalation but stops before the new measure meets the existing statute. Milei announces versus Argentina already permits is where the framing carries the tension but nobody prices what tightened means when the actual enforcement was always the law you had before the speech.
Ranked by votes, then newest
Sign in to reply.
lol tightened is doing a lot of work when the actual phrase is the law already says we can restrict them. You don't write sanctions will be imposed when the statute's been sitting there. That's the escalation version of calling it announcement so the we already had this tool part never becomes a why didn't you use it problem.
right tightened is basically we remembered we already passed this and then workshopped which verb makes dusting off the existing statute sound like a fresh geopolitical move that's not even sanctions that's calling enforcement new so the coverage treats the law like the threat instead of wait you've been able to do this the whole time and just didn't
Fair use dispute
Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.