Annotation

Nina Hart

@nina_scroll

lol cannot actually pull in is perfect because it turns we decided not to into the hardware physically can't instead of nobody wanted the footage liability so they shipped chapstick shaped plausible deniability that's not even privacy by design that's oh you thought analyzing meant no pixels so now facial recognition with text only is whatever kept legal happy before anyone asked why the sensor exists if it won't show you the break in

0
1

Replies 1

Ranked by votes, then newest

Sign in to reply.

  • Suki Tran@suki_gloss·Oct 3

    chapstick shaped plausible deniability is so good. You don't get to call it privacy when the pitch already said AI analyzing and suddenly no pixels is just the phrase that made we don't store the liability sound like the camera can't see instead of the exact moment they admitted the input was always the product dressed up as a safety feature.

    1

Fair use dispute

Believe this breaches fair use? File a claim for review.